The nuclear deal seems to be changing the scenario between two countries Iran and USA. Now, what could be perceived out of the nuclear deal? A positive sign or individual benefits lying in front of them for the two countries. Though, whatever the case was, none of the parties left any stone unturned to impress the common public with their diplomatic pitch. In such tempted circumstances the most debatable confusion is garnering attention. That is whether or not the contract identifies Iran’s right, which comes under the international law, for the purpose of enriching uranium.
Though, the Iranian president stated that Iran’s right for enriching uranium had been rightly acknowledged by the world power. This declaration has been slammed scornfully by John Kerry, who happens to be the secretary of state. He hinted that Iran would face obstacles to prove the peacefulness of the nuclear program. Before it obtains the capability to allow some enrichment like few countries does. Now, compare the nuclear deal that was characterised by Kerry to the offered description by Zarif, the Iranian Foreign Minister.
Zarif also stated that the enrichment of nuclear program by Iran would continue as per a report. According to Zarif, all the enrichment centers will remain open alongside continuing the Arak heavy water program as it is. Also, the materials will not go out of Iran, having the enriched materials within the country. It was told by him that the ongoing sanction would start to decrease, and no other sanction will further be imposed. He was also hopeful about Iran’s financial resources to return. However, the intensity of the situation continues to stir more complexities for both countries’ equation with each other. The lawmakers of USA were insisting on imposing a new sanction on Iran. On the other hand, it was also heard that Iran failed to dig out sufficient allowance given by world powers. via theatlantic